More stories in Front Page | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
• HC acquits 4 in '07 carnage • Word of caution on street power • A week on, a 14-year lesson • Hotelier slur on PC, Delhi U-turn after uproar • Girl hugs a dad, parts with another • War ends, warts torment • Boulder lifeline, echo of death • Talks on at HAL for copter return • Jan. 4 poll for Karbi council Uncertainty in Iraq as US army ends mission |
Uncertainty in Iraq as US army ends mission | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
THOM SHANKER AND MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baghdad, Dec. 15: The US military officially declared an end to its mission in Iraq today even as violence continues to plague the country and the Muslim world remains distrustful of American power. In a fortified concrete courtyard at the airport in Baghdad, US defence secretary Leon E. Panetta thanked the more than one million American service members who have served in Iraq for "the remarkable progress" made over the past nine years but acknowledged the severe challenges that face the struggling democracy. "Let me be clear: Iraq will be tested in the days ahead — by terrorism, and by those who would seek to divide, by economic and social issues, by the demands of democracy itself," Panetta said. "Challenges remain, but the US will be there to stand by the Iraqi people as they navigate those challenges to build a stronger and more prosperous nation." The tenor of the farewell ceremony, officially called "Casing the Colours", was likely to sound an uncertain trumpet for a war that was launched to rid Iraq of weapons of mass destruction it did not have and now ends without the sizeable, enduring American military presence for which many officers had hoped. The tone of the string of ceremonies culminating with the final withdrawal event today has been understated in keeping with an administration that campaigned to end an unpopular war it inherited. Although the ceremony today marked the end of the war, the military still has two bases in Iraq and roughly 4,000 troops, including several hundred that attended the ceremony. At the height of the war in 2007 there were 505 bases and over 150,000 troops. According to military officials, the remaining troops are still being attacked on a daily basis, mainly by indirect fire attacks on the bases and road side bomb explosions against convoys heading south through Iraq to bases in Kuwait. Even after the last two bases are closed and the final American combat troops withdraw from Iraq by December 31 under rules of an agreement with the Baghdad government, a few hundred military personnel and Pentagon civilians will remain, working within the American embassy as part of an office of security cooperation to assist in arms sales and training. But negotiations could resume next year on whether additional American military personnel can return to further assist their Iraqi counterparts. Senior American military officers have made no secret that they see key gaps in Iraq's ability to defend its sovereign soil and even to secure its oil platforms offshore in the Persian Gulf. Air defences are seen as a critical gap in Iraqi capabilities, but American military officers also see significant shortcomings in Iraq's ability to sustain a military, whether moving food and fuel or servicing the armoured vehicles it is inheriting from Americans or the jet-fighters it is buying, and has shortfalls in military engineers, artillery and intelligence, as well. The tenuous security atmosphere in Iraq was underscored by helicopters that hovered over the ceremony, scanning the ground for rocket attacks. Although there is far less violence across Iraq than at the height of the sectarian conflict in 2006 and 2007, but there are bombings on a nearly daily basis and Americans remain a target of Shia militants. During a 45-minute ceremony that ended the military mission, Panetta acknowledged that "the cost was high — in blood and treasure of the United States, and also for the Iraqi people. But those lives have not been lost in vain — they gave birth to an independent, free and sovereign Iraq". The war was launched by the Bush administration in March 2003 on arguments that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and had ties to al Qaida that might grow to an alliance threatening the US with a mass-casualty terror attack. As the absence of stockpiles of unconventional weapons proved a humiliation for the administration and the intelligence community, the war effort was reframed as being about bringing democracy to West Asia. And, indeed, there was euphoria among many Iraqis at an American-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein. But the support soon soured amid a growing sense of heavy-handed occupation fuelled by the unleashing of bloody sectarian and religious rivalries. The American presence also proved a magnet for militant fighters and an al Qaida-affiliated group took root among the Sunni population here. While the terror organisation had been rendered ineffective by a punishing series of Special Operations raids that decapitated the organisation, intelligence specialists fear that it is in resurgence. The American military presence here, viewed as an occupation across the Muslim world, also hampered Washington's ability to cast a narrative from the US in support of the Arab Spring uprisings this year. Even handing bases over to the Iraqi government over recent months proved vexing for the military. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NEW YORK TIMES NEWS SERVICEU.S. Marks End to 9-Year War, Leaving an Uncertain Iraq![]() Andrea Bruce for The New York Times American forces, arriving in Kuwait in one of the last convoys out of Iraq, took the same highway they came in on in 2003. By TIM ARANGOPublished: December 15, 2011BAGHDAD — At a crowded market in the city center here, the flotsam of the war is for sale. Ripped Fuel workout supplement. Ready-to-eat meals, macaroni and cheese "Mexican style." Pistol holsters. Nothing seems off limits to the merchants out for a quick dinar, not even a bottle of prescription pills from a pharmacy in Waco, Tex., probably tossed out by a departing soldier. MultimediaWhat Iraqis Think of the American Withdrawal: Mosul and BasraDecember 15, 2011 6:25pm A Withdrawal Ceremony in Iraq, Observed by Few IraqisDecember 15, 2011 2:00pm New Jersey Help Line for Troops Expands to Nationwide ProgramDecember 15, 2011 Whatever Happened to ... FallujaDecember 14, 2011 Related
Related in Opinion
Michael Kamber for The New York TimesA soldier at a Baghdad market, the scene of bloody attacks in the past. Merchants now sell items left behind by departing soldiers. The concrete blast walls that shielded the shopping stalls have lately come down. Since then, three explosions have struck the market, killing several people. "This will be an easy target for car bombs," said Muhammad Ali, a merchant who lost two brothers during the cruelest times of the conflict. "People will die here." After nearly nine years, about 4,500 American fatalities and $1 trillion, America's war in Iraq is about to end. Officials marked the finish on Thursday with a modest ceremony at the airport days before the last troops take the southern highway to Kuwait, going out as they came in, to conclude the United States' most ambitious and bloodiest military campaign since Vietnam. For the United States, the war leaves an uncertain legacy as Americans weigh what may have been accomplished against the price paid, with so many dead and wounded. The Iraqi dictator, Saddam Hussein, was vanquished, but the failure to find illicit weapons undermined the original rationale, leaving a bitter taste as casualties mounted. The lengthy conflict and repeated deployments strained the country and its resources, raising questions about America's willingness to undertake future wars on such a grand scale. Iraqis will be left with a country that is not exactly at war, and not exactly at peace. It has improved in many ways since the 2007 troop "surge," but it is still a shattered country marred by violence and political dysfunction, a land defined on sectarian lines whose future, for better or worse, is now in the hands of its people. "It is the end for the Americans only," Emad Risn, an Iraqi columnist, recently wrote in Assabah al-Jadeed, a government-financed newspaper. "Nobody knows if the war will end for Iraqis, too." Iraq will now be on its own both to find its place in a region upended by revolutions and to manage its rivalry withIran, which will look to expand its influence culturally and economically in the power vacuum left by the United States military. While American officials worry about the close political ties between Iraq's Shiite leadership and Iran, the picture at the grass-roots level is more nuanced. Iraqis complain about shoddy Iranian consumer goods — they frequently mention low-quality yogurts and cheeses — and the menacing role of Iranian-backed militias, which this year killed many American soldiers. Failed Reconciliation The Iranian rivalry frequently plays out in the Shiite holy city of Najaf, where Iraq's religious authorities are based. Iran, which like Iraq is majority Shiite, recently installed one of its leading clerics in Najaf, raising worries that Iran is trying to spread its brand of clerical rule to Iraq. Meanwhile, Moktada al-Sadr, an anti-American cleric with very close ties to Iran, has recently said that with the military withdrawal, American diplomats are now fair game for his militiamen. Iraq faces a multitude of vexing problems the Americans tried and failed to resolve, from how to divide the country's oil wealth to sectarian reconciliation to the establishment of an impartial justice system. A longstanding dispute festers in the north over how to share power in Kirkuk between Arabs, Kurds and Turkmen, an ominous harbinger for power struggles that may ensue in a post-America Iraq. A recent deal between Exxon Mobil and the Kurdistan government in the north has been deemed illegal by Baghdad in the absence of procedures for sharing the country's oil resources. "We are in a standstill and things are paralyzed," said Adel Abdul Mahdi, a prominent Shiite politician and former vice president of Iraq, describing the process of political reconciliation among Iraq's three main factions, Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds. "We are going from bad to worse." A surprising number of Iraqis refuse to believe that the Americans are really leaving, the effect of a conspiratorial mind-set developed over years living under the violent and repressive dictatorship of Mr. Hussein, and a view of history informed by the Crusades, colonialism and other perceived injustices at the hands of the West. Reporting was contributed by Jack Healy, Michael S. Schmidt, Andrew E. Kramer, Duraid Adnan, Omar al-Jawoshy and an employee of The New York Times. Pullout 'with honour' to be determined as Iraq faces future without AmericansPAUL KORINGWASHINGTON— From Friday's Globe and MailPublished Thursday, Dec. 15, 2011 9:39PM ESTLast updated Thursday, Dec. 15, 2011 10:10PM ESTMORE RELATED TO THIS STORY
|
No comments:
Post a Comment