Follow palashbiswaskl on Twitter

Friday, October 29, 2010

Fwd: [bangla-vision] Final e-mail - Eastman now 100% exclusive rense -=- Ocean Full of Oil esophagus’ desolving, hearts enlarging -=- Paul Craig Roberts: War on Terror a fraud -=- Zionist Zelikow Key Role in 9/11 falseflag Cover-Up -failures of defen

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Dick Eastman <>
Date: Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:20 AM
Subject: [bangla-vision] Final e-mail - Eastman now 100% exclusive rense -=- Ocean Full of Oil esophagus' desolving, hearts enlarging -=- Paul Craig Roberts: War on Terror a fraud -=- Zionist Zelikow Key Role in 9/11 falseflag Cover-Up -failures of defense systems delibe


Items follow,
but first this announcement
This is your e-mail messages from Dick Eastman.  My messages will appear on Rense or not at all.  I am emptying my address book of all of your names.   Look for my articles, if any, here:
I figure that without -- after all of the other anti-Zionist websites Jewish ops  have taken down recently -- we will never again have the chance to win the information war against Zionist-Masonic world domination.  This is my "Alamo" stand with Jeff Rense  -  or is it Custer given the hair etc.  Fighting the good fight depends on knowing when to risk everything in a decisive battle.
So happy thanksgiving, christmas, new year -- and adios.
Dick Eastman (that's  me) is discontinuing his mailings indefinitely.   From now on I will write exclusively for Jeff Rense.  This is not for any compensation.  This is  not by prior arrangement with Rense.  I have no understanding that Rense will publish any of what I send him.  Jeff is learning of this with this letter.
I am not angry with anyone -- this is purely a tactical move in the great battle against evil.  I am declaring my side and my 100 percent commitment to my side.
Anyone who accepts Mark Glenn's accusations that Rense is anti-Islaam and secretly Zionist and pro-Israel of course receives my full scorn and rejection.  As I find out who you are I will block you mail from my inbox.  As for the rest   -- if you won't fight then it is folly for me to keep fighting to link up with you.  If you won't fight for what rense has done you certainly can't have any attachment to my cause when the moment of testing comes.
For the friends of humanity who need to be reminded of the pro-Islaam articles, pro-Palestine, pro-Iraq and pro-Afghanistan letters of mine that have appeared on  -- here is just a sampling:
Who says Jeff Rense is anti-Islaam and an enemy of the faithful in Islaam?  Who says he is secretly working for the Zionists?
I challenge all of the Pro-Mark Glenn operatives and dupes to randomly select for or six of the following partial list of my articles on Rense.  Or read them all.  Or go to the  search engine and find others.
Has hit man mole Mark Glenn told you about these articles of mine that Rense put up and still maintains?  This representative sampling proves the falsity of all Glenn has been saying about rense.

Riki Ott:  'People Now Dropping Dead' In the Gulf
"The people that did evacuate (the gulf) are glad they did"
And for good reason."
" I am dealing with about 3 -4  autopsies right now… I know of people who's esophagus' are de-solving, disintegrating… I know of people with 4.75% of their lung capacity, with enlarged hearts… All of these people have oil in their bodies."

An Ocean Full of Oil
Zionism: A pretest for Genocide

America's Gulf Crisis - Ongoing Coverup and Denial

Debt Has Increased $5 Trillion Since Speaker the Speaker Vowed, 'No New Deficit Spending'   Highest Treason Substantiated

30 Reasons Why People Should Be Getting Really Nervous About The State Of The U.S. Economy
#1 Corporate insiders are selling off stock at a blinding pace and are looking for the exits.  Alan Newman, the editor of the Crosscurrents newsletter, examined a number of the top performing stocks in the market including Google, Apple and Target and found that the ratio of corporate insider stock sold to corporate insider stock purchased over the last six months for those companies was 3,177 to 1.  At the group of firms that Newman looked at, corporate insiders had purchased 38,000 shares of stock over the last six months and yet had sold off over 120 million shares.

Want to get away with murder? Become a bank.
Judeo-Pornographic Society Social Sabotage:  Nine out of Ten Chilren on the Net See Internet Pornography:

"I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - President James Madison
"The enormous gap between what U.S. leaders do in the world and what Americans think their leaders are doing is one of the great propaganda accomplishments of the dominant political mythology." - Michael Parenti, political scientist/author

Subject: [frameup] Paul Craig Roberts: The War on Terror is a fraud....; Zionist Zelikow's Key Role in 9/11 Inside Job Cover-Up (they were not failures, they were deliberate)
Does anyone remember the "cakewalk war" that would last six weeks, cost $50-$60 billion, and be paid for out of Iraqi oil revenues?

Does anyone remember that White House economist Lawrence Lindsey was fired by Dubya because Lindsey estimated that the Iraq war could cost as much as $200 billion?

Lindsey was fired for over-estimating the cost of a war that, according to Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes, has cost 15 times more than Lindsey estimated. And the US still has 50,000 troops in Iraq.

Does anyone remember that just prior to the US invasion of Iraq, the US government declared victory over the Taliban in Afghanistan?

Does anyone remember that the reason Dubya gave for invading Iraq was Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction, weapons that the US government knew did not exist?
·         John Bursill's blog
·         Read more
Submitted by greenback on Tue, 10/19/2010 - 9:24pm

Zelikow's Key Role in 9/11 Cover-Up

·         greenback's blog
In an interview on the Fox Business Network, a retired U.S. int. officer accused the official in charge of the 9/11 Commission of a cover-up of intelligence failures leading up to the terrorist attacks on Sep 11, 2001.

Appearing on the political talk show Freedom Watch, Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, a former Defense Intelligence Agency officer and the author of Operation Dark Heart, a much-hyped new book on the war in Afghanistan, spoke about his mid-Oct 2003 encounter with Dr. Philip Zelikow, then executive director of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States.

During a fact-finding mission to Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan, Zelikow's team was briefed by Shaffer on Able Danger, a DIA data mining project that had allegedly identified Mohammed Atta as a threat to the U.S. a year before 9/11.

Parenthetically, the "Mohammed Atta" identified by Able Danger may have been an imposter operating under a stolen identity, as occurred in the assassination of a senior Hamas official in Dubai. In an interview with a German newspaper, reported by the Guardian, Mohammed Atta's father claimed that his son had nothing to do with the attacks and was still alive a year after 9/11.

Whichever Mohammed Atta was referred to by Shaffer in Bagram, Zelikow reportedly "fell silent with shock at the news."

According to Shaffer, Zelikow came to him at the end of the meeting, gave him his card, and said: "What you said today is critically important, very important. Please come see me when you return to Washington D.C."

On his return to Washington in Jan-2004, Shaffer immediately contacted Zelikow's office and was told to "stand by." After a week passed, Shaffer called again, and this time was told by Zelikow's staff: "We don't need you to come in. We have all the information on Able Danger we need. Thank you anyway."

None of the information provided by Shaffer appeared in the 9/11 Commission's
585-page report, however.

In Sept 2005, more than a year after the publication of the 9/11 report, Shaffer said he met with one of the 9/11 commissioners in Philadelphia. Over lunch, he told the commissioner what he had told Zelikow in Afghanistan. The commissioner said that "he had never heard any of this," adding that, "had he heard of it, it would have been something that was very much of interest to he [sic] and the commission."

"So there's a lot of things that never made it in that 9/11 report?" asked Judge Andrew Napolitano, the host of Freedom Watch.

"Things were either by negligence left out, or, and I believe, by purpose left out," Shaffer replied.

Another guest on the show, Michael Scheuer, who headed the CIA's bin Laden unit from 1996 to 1999, spoke of a similarly frustrating experience with the 9/11 Commission staff director.

Describing the 9/11 Commission Report as "a whitewash, and a lie from top to bottom," Scheuer said he provided Zelikow with over 400 pages of official government documents detailing intelligence failures before 9/11.

"I never heard one word back from Zelikow," he said.

"They all seemed very interested in what you had to say," the former CIA officer added, referring to meetings he had with Zelikow and his staff, "but at the end of the day, it didn't make it into the report."

This is not the first time that questions have been raised about Zelikow's handling of the 9/11 Commission.

In his 2009 book, The Commission, Philip Shenon, an investigative reporter for the New York Times, wrote about "how tightly Zelikow was able to control the flow of information on the commission," and that "everything" was "run through" him.

While Zelikow's tight control of the commission excluded disturbing evidence from national security experts like Shaffer and Scheuer, a dubious scholar like Laurie Mylroie was afforded ample opportunity to promote the most spurious justification for the Iraq war. Mylroie, whose major booster in government was Paul Wolfowitz, argued that Iraq had been involved in every major terrorist attack against the United States since the early 1990s, including 9/11. During commission hearings on al-Qaeda, Zelikow, writes Shenon, "made sure that she had a prominent place at the witness table."

And why wouldn't he? After all, Zelikow had an important role in, as Shenon puts it, "developing the scholarly underpinnings for the Iraq war." It was Zelikow who had authored a thirty-one-page "preemptive war" doctrine which George W. Bush announced to the world in 2002 as "The National Security Strategy of the United States."

"Why would Iraq attack America or use nuclear weapons against us?" Zelikow asked an audience at the University of Virginia in Sept 2002. In a rare moment of candour, Zelikow proceeded to explain that the real reason for preemptive war against Iraq was "the threat against Israel."
Read Full:

Employment is WORSE than The Depression - now.

Aussie Trades Unionist Exposes 9/11 Cover-up  ---  good on ya mate!

Kevin Bracken, Australian trade unionist stands up for 9/11 truth – PM discusses in Federal Parliament

Pat Robertson quoted on Rense:
One more note from Dick Eastman:

Long Ago I occasionally corresponded with Devvy Kidd  -- she received all of my postings and never complained about any of them except two  -- and they were had nothing to do with Islaam or the faithful in Islaam.  I have publically parted with her views -- and with Huffington who is her primary sponsor, whom I have always viewed as "tea party" opposition even before there were such stupid things as Tea Parties.

Nevertheless  -- I can see why Rense has kept her on his website --  consider:

Devvy Kidd has usually stuck with American politics, left and right.  Here is a list of her articles on rense, but first read this example of early Devvy Kidd:


Devvy has written articles like this:





By: Devvy

February 28, 2004

The Passion of the Christ has created an amazing storm of accusations of "anti-Semitism" since last year. The only special interest group in America to hurl this hot button label has been Abraham Foxman and his associates from the ADL (Anti Defamation League); the pile on from Rabbi's didn't take long after that. This defender of the Jewish religion disguised himself and snuck into a showing of The Passion of the Christ before its official opening! This is true and would be laughable if not for such a serious subject matter as accusing someone of hating people of the Jewish faith.

As a matter of fact, Mr. Foxman has applied his arsenal of hot button labels to anyone who even questions the legality of the income tax! Yes, this is a fact and one wonders what on earth being "anti-Semitic" has to do with questioning the income tax? I would like to ask Mr. Foxman this question to his face and actually extended an olive branch to him regarding the recent WTP 2004 Convention outside Washington, DC, just so I could ask him. Unfortunately, Mr. Foxman didn't even have the common business courtesy to respond to my letter.

What is a Semite and what constitutes being "anti-Semitic"?

This is a very important question that needs to be answered - especially if pundits, journalists and religious leaders are going to throw it around like confetti. Mr. Foxman and other Rabbi's who have viciously attacked Mel Gibson's movie make the accusation that Gibson is "anti-Semitic" and his movie will promote "anti-Semitism." For some reason, this label was never flung at Gibson until he made a "passion" movie that is very serious about the subject matter.

What then is a Semite? After checking various dictionaries and sources, this is the common definition:

1. A member of a group of Semitic speaking peoples of the Near East and northern Africa, including the Arabs, Arameans, Babylonians, Carthaginians, Ethiopians, Hebrews, and Phoenicians.
2. A Jew.
3. Bible. A descendant of Shem. According to

Sem`it´ic Noun1. Semitic - a major branch of the Afro-Asiatic language family
Afrasian, Afrasian language, Afro-Asiatic, Afroasiatic, Afroasiatic language, Hamito-Semitic - a large family of related languages spoken both in Asia and Africa
Akkadian - an ancient branch of the Semitic languages
Amharic, Ethiopian language - the dominant and official language of Ethiopia; a semitic language much influenced by the Cushitic language with which Amhara people have been in close contact
Arabic, Arabic language - the Semitic language of the Arabs; spoken in a variety of dialects
Aramaic - a Semitic language originally of the ancient Arameans but still spoken by other people in southwestern Asia
Canaanitic, Canaanitic language - a group of Semitic languages
Adj.1.Semitic - of or relating to the group of Semitic languages; "Semitic tongues have a complicated morphology"
2.Semitic - of or relating to or characteristic of Semites; "Semite peoples"

According to the web site:, Semite means:

"Semites are peoples who speak Semitic languages; the group includes Arabs, Aramaeans, Jews, and many Ethiopians. In a Biblical sense, Semites are peoples whose ancestry can be traced back to Shem, Noah's eldest son. The ancient Semitic populations were pastoral Nomads who several centuries before the Christian Era were migrating in large numbers from Arabia to Mesopotamia, the coasts of the Mediterranean Sea, and the Nile River delta. Jews and other Semites settled in villages in Judea, southern Palestine.

"Present day speakers of Semitic languages are as diverse in physical, psychological, cultural, and sociological characteristics as are speakers of Indo European languages. The most prominent Semites today are Arabs and Jews. They are different in many ways, and they have absorbed a variety of European traits through centuries of migration and trade. The origin of Semitic languages, however, and many similarities in the stories of Islam and Judaism reflect a common ancient history."

Further research shows that about 12 percent of Muslims worldwide are Arabs. As an example, there are more Muslims in Indonesia than in all Arab countries combined. India, Iran, other parts of East Asia and sub-Saharan Africa have large populations of Muslims. Islam has a strong Arab flavor, though, as the religion's holiest places are in the Middle East, and the Quran was originally written in Arabic. Islam is the religion, a Muslim is a follower of the religion.

According to the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia's web site:

"On September 23, 1932, the country was named the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia as an Islamic state, with Arabic designated as the national language and the Holy Qur'an as its constitution."

How about Ethiopia? They are part of the Semitic speaking peoples, yet that country is quite diverse:

"The majority of Ethiopian believers are Christian, with a large Muslim minority. There are still a few small Felasha Jewish communities in Ethiopia, as well. Animists are rare in Ethiopia today."

Studying all these definitions, it appears that there are many races who are 'Semitic speaking' peoples of different religions. Even though Semites can be Arabs, the official designation of Saudi Arabia is an Islamic State, not a Jewish state. Can one then conclude that if you're "anti-Semitic" you're anti-Muslim?

Anti-Semitic means being against the 'Semitic speaking peoples' of the Near East and northern Africa, including the Arabs, Arameans, Babylonians, Carthaginians, Ethiopians, Hebrews, and Phoenicians. One thing about doing research on any subject, at least to this writer, is that you learn and one web site that presents easy to understand facts about the subject of Semitic speaking peoples is: fo/bender.html. Everyone is encouraged to visit that site to get a better grasp of this subject matter.

According to these credible reference sources, Semites are peoples who speak Semitic languages; the group includes Arabs, Aramaeans, Jews, and many Ethiopians who may be of any religion they choose, they don't have to be of the Jewish faith. So, can we conclude that being "anti-Semitic" applies to anyone regardless of their religion who is of the family of Semitic speaking peoples? If that is the case, where are the representatives of other "Semitic speaking peoples" and why aren't they all over the stupid tube with the "anti-Semitic" chant against Gibson and his movie?

We have established that Semites are people who speak Semitic languages. How then does that make someone a hater of one specific religion, i.e. the Jewish faith an "anti-Semite" if the definition refers to people who speak Semitic languages? Yet, to listen to people like Mr. Foxman, one would be led to believe that anti-Semitic means people who hate the Jewish race.

I checked many web sites on the question: Is being Jewish a race? According to Lisa Katz:

"Being Jewish is not a race because Jews do not share one common ancestry or biological distinction. People of many different races have become Jewish people over the years. Is being Jewish a nationality? Being Jewish is not a nationality because Jews have been dispersed throughout the world for almost two thousand years. People of many different nationalities are Jewish. Is being Jewish a religious identity? Being Jewish means you are a part of a religious movement."

Mr. Foxman, et al, have screeched for months that The Passion of the Christ will incite "anti-Semitism" and violence against Jews. According to all the dictionaries and credible source references that I researched, this alleged future violence would also have to extend to all people of the Semitic speaking languages, regardless of their religion or race. When was the last time you heard of a rash of violence against Christian Ethiopians in these united States? After all, they are of the 'Semitic speaking languages' group.

What does the ADL fear about The Passion of the Christ?

There has been a moderate amount of publicity focusing on how many individuals involved in the making of The Passion of the Christ converted to Christianity as a result of the story of Jesus and his sacrifice for all mankind. The message in this movie is about forgiving and love and yes, that Jesus is the son of God. Apparently some individuals on the set were so moved by the message, they became Christians.

This message doesn't sit well with Mr. Foxman because those who practice the Jewish faith maintain that Jesus was just another prophet who came along and perished, end of story. This is and always has been the rub between Christians and those of the Jewish faith. It hasn't for this writer, because I believe everyone has the God-given right to worship as they choose, it's none of my business nor do I gang up on anyone for their beliefs. Each of us will know the truth on the day we face God for our judgment.

Mr. Foxman should not fear the message of The Passion of the Christ. Those who are true to the Jewish faith will remain Jewish and those who are true to the teachings of Christ (Christians) will remain faithful. Those of the Christian faiths, Catholic, Baptist and so forth, are not going to view The Passion of the Christ and then run out and do violence to anyone of the Jewish faith whether they are Arab, Ethiopian or born right here in America.

There has been religious bigotry in America long before Gibson's movie and unfortunately, there are stupid people out there who would engage in it without The Passion of the Christ. There might be a few nut cases out there who harass people of the Jewish faith following the release of this move just because it's been so highly promoted as a "maybe" and are looking for any excuse. I would recommend Mr. Foxman conduct fund raising for the ADL against legitimate agitators against people of the Jewish faith and stop smearing Catholics.

Enough already

As for the puffed up peacocks who write for publications like the NY Times of "all the news that's fit to fake" fame, take a break why don't you? The same goes for the mouthy curmudgeon, Andy Rooney, whose comments border on absurd silliness. I'm sure it must irk them to no end that their constant tirades against the movie have helped to make it a huge box office success and I'm certain that privately, Mel Gibson says thank you!

The Passion of the Christ is a movie made by a very skilled and successful Hollywood actor and director. Mel Gibson made and financed a project he says came from his heart and was meant to be a message of love and forgiveness. People from all religions ought to give Gibson the benefit of the doubt instead of buying into the cheap and tawdry fund raising tactics of Abe Foxman.

Is bigot the more appropriate label?

Bigotry is defined as "one who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ."

This entire smear campaign smells of bigotry by Abraham Foxman. Gibson is Catholic. Mr. Foxman has attacked me in the most putrid fashion without any justification whatsoever; I am Catholic. Mr. Foxman has attacked former IRS CID agent Joseph Banister in the same disgusting fashion without any justification whatsoever; Joseph is Catholic. While Mr. Foxman likes to mouth politically correct platitudes about promoting harmony between Christians and Jews, from what I have seen, I don't feel that his words come from the heart. What I see is a pattern of hatred against individuals who are Catholic.

If Mr. Foxman wants to accuse The Passion of the Christ as being anti-Jewish, he should just come out and say so with the proper label instead of flinging "anti-Semitic" as the one size fits all for anyone of the Christian faith who Foxman apparently hates - especially Catholics.

© 2004 Devvy Kidd - All Rights Reserved

Devvy has appeared on Rense for many years -- back when even I read Devvy -- because her views on Islaam were never revealed in her writings!!!  Devvy has been a regular fixture on Rense  -- his readers expect Devvy on Rense -- of course Rense is too busy to read the Devvy articles -- he merely trusted her.   But when she slipped in her "Pat Robertson" and everyone attacked Rense for it  -- Rense refused to attack this (wrongheaded) woman out of pride and loyalty  -- after all she was his guest on the site -- an unpaid contributor over all these years  -- views on Islam   Look at Devvy's archive and see how many articles are about Islaam or the Moslem world:

Devvy Kid Archive

                     (Obviously Anti-Islam has not been a regular theme  -- she had never written such an attack before!!!!)








From our friend Gajendra Singh

Wikileaks Confirm Western Culture of Torture & Lies
Gen Taguba's Abu Ghraib Report & US Franchised Torture Revisited.
Part I
'It would be a good idea.' Mahatma Gandhi, when asked about his views on western culture.

Recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world : Preamble, Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

"As usual, the Arabs knew. They knew all about the mass torture, the promiscuous shooting of civilians, the outrageous use of air power against family homes, the vicious American and British mercenaries, the cemeteries of the innocent dead. All of Iraq knew. Because they were the victims." -- Robert Fisk on Wikileaks in 'Independent '

Hosting by WikiLeaks on its website some 391,832 US military messages documenting actions and reports on Iraq over the period 2004-2009,can be divided in five heads:
Reliance on private contractors aka mercenaries ; the so-called "surge" of 30,000 additional US troops; the deaths of Iraqi civilians - killed mostly by other Iraqis, but also by the US; a litany of prisoner abuse by Iraqis - which US officials ignored - even more lurid than the infamous photographs of torture from Abu Ghraib prison in 2004; and the so called "aggressive" intervention of Iran's military providing "weapons, training and sanctuary" to Shia combatants.
Robert Fisk highlights the main points as follows

Prisoners abused, raped and murdered; Hundreds of incidents of abuse and torture of prisoners by "collaborationist" Iraqi security services, up to and including rape and murder. Since these are itemised in US reports, American authorities now face accusations of failing to investigate them. UN leaders and campaigners are calling for an official investigation.

Civilian death toll cover-up; Coalition leaders have always said "we don't do death tolls", but the documents reveal many deaths were logged. Respected British group Iraq Body Count says that, after preliminary examination of a sample of the documents, there are an estimated 15,000 extra civilian deaths, raising their total to 122,000.

The shooting of men trying to surrender; In February 2007, an Apache helicopter killed two Iraqis, suspected of firing mortars, as they tried to surrender. A military lawyer is quoted as saying: "They cannot surrender to aircraft and are still valid targets."

Private security firm abuses; Britain's Bureau of Investigative Journalism says it found documents detailing new cases of alleged wrongful killings of civilians involving Blackwater, since renamed Xe Services. Despite this, Xe retains extensive US contracts in Afghanistan.

Al-Qa'ida's use of children and "mentally handicapped" for bombing ;A teenage boy with Down's syndrome who killed six and injured 34 in a suicide attack in Diyala was said to be an example of an ongoing al-Qa'ida strategy to recruit those with learning difficulties. A doctor is alleged to have sold a list of female patients with learning difficulties to insurgents.

Hundreds of civilians killed at check points; Out of the 832 deaths recorded at checkpoints in Iraq between 2004 and 2009, analysis by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism suggests 681 were civilians. Fifty families were shot at and 30 children killed. Only 120 insurgents were killed in checkpoint incidents.

Iranian influence; Reports detail US concerns that Iranian agents had trained, armed and directed militants in Iraq. In one document, the US military warns a militia commander believed to be behind the deaths of US troops and kidnapping of Iraqi officials was trained by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard.

But the WikiLeaks give little information on the mistreatment of prisoners in US-run detention facilities, or in CIA franchised torture centers in east Europe and elsewhere, worse than Abu Gharib and Guantanamo ,while chilling details of abuse of Iraqis by Iraq's own army and police.
[ On abuse of Iraqis by US, (Gen Taguba's report) and US franchised torture see below] .

Reaction to the Leaks

The Wihileaks have unleashed bickering among Iraqi politicians. For example, a senior member of the Iraqiya bloc led by former Iraqi prime minister Iyad Allawi called for an investigation into possible connections between torture operations in Iraqi prisons and Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki.
US Defense Department ; Geoff Morrell, the US Defense Department press secretary, strongly condemned both WikiLeaks and the release of the Iraq documents.

"We deplore WikiLeaks for inducing individuals to break the law, leak classified documents and then cavalierly share that secret information with the world, including our enemies," he said.

Iran's Press TV declared, "Whistleblower website WikiLeaks has released documents suggesting that the Pentagon instructed US-led forces to 'secretly' torture detainees in Iraq."

Robert Fisk in London's 'Independent'

The western leadership and subservient corporate media pretend not to know. They countered every claim, every allegation against the Americans or British with some general – that " ghastly US military spokesman Mark Kimmitt and the awful chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Peter Pace, come to mind – to ring-fence us with lies. Find a man who'd been tortured and you'd be told it was terrorist propaganda; discover a house full of children killed by an American air strike and that, too, would be terrorist propaganda, or "collateral damage", or a simple phrase: We have nothing on that."

Those who went around torturing the Iraqis were undisciplined gunmen aka mercenaries, many recruited from criminal elements , so that they could be shown as outside the US armed forces and also military discipline under international law. Veritable outlaws ,a gang of criminals , well paid , with license to torture and kill ;they murdered their way around the cities of Iraq ,apart from protecting diplomats and generals. Though written in bleak militarese ,this material can be used by lawyers in courts ,continued Fisk.

But it always happens like this. In Kuwait, after the 1991 liberation , US troops heard Palestinians being tortured by Kuwaitis in police stations with a Kuwaiti royal family member involved. US forces did nothing. They just complained to the royal family. Soldiers are always being told not to intervene. But then the Israeli army was told in September 1982 that Israel's Phalangist allies had just murdered some women and children? "We know, it's not to our liking, and don't interfere," said battalion commander about the criminal enterprise of Sabra and Chatila refugee camp massacres.

Throughout history compared to the invaders and the rulers from the East, the Western culture and rule has been based on Cartesian material outlook on life .The Nazi crematoriums was an acme of western economic optimization of using even human resources ( Jewish and other bodies )to the last bone and the drop of blood.
What else to expect from the people of USA whose history is a narrative of landmarks like the Massacre at Wounded Knee, who have morphed from savagery to high-tech savagery and gave to the last generation, Mai Lai massacre, and during brutal occupation of Iraq , Guantanamo, Abu Gharib, Falluja. Nevertheless, instead of looking at themselves, they pontificate to the rest of the humanity, with their uncivilized discourse.

Americans at home
In America, African Americans have been deprived of the most basic rights and opportunities. This was especially true in the southern states, which were once a byword for poverty and backwardness among people of all races. For a long time US refused to act at a national level to stop lynching, often arguing that it was a local problem thus everyone suffered the consequences of shutting off a huge segment of the population from equality and justice.
Lynching were barred quite late in last century  .But in New Orleans and the region, white America's putrid underbelly one can see the reality. How American Africans were treated and are still being treated .Those who visited the region at the time of September , 2005 Katrina disaster say that there has been no change in the pitiable conditions of the Blacks and poor in USA for the last two centuries.

London's Observer on Katrina;
London's Observer noted "Perhaps nothing else so encapsulates the endless paradoxes of being black in America. Never have blacks had so much legal freedom, yet there are record numbers in jail.
Traditional black neighborhoods have collapsed into drug-ridden crime strongholds, even as the black middle class is the biggest in history.

"It is now 40 years since the Voting Rights Act that secured the black vote. [In Florida 2000!] It is 10 years since hundreds of thousands of blacks came to Washington in the Million Man March to demand a way out of poverty. It is a single month since Hurricane Katrina exposed the racial fault lines that fracture the big cities.
"Almost four decades after King was killed, there are still two Americas. One is largely white and wealthy, one largely black and poor. They live cheek by jowl in the same country yet in separate worlds. The shocking thing about the TV pictures from New Orleans was not black poverty; it was the reaction of whites. 'Most whites were shocked about the amount of poverty in New Orleans, but black media have talked about poverty for the past 20 years,' said David Canton, professor of history at Connecticut College.

"Bare statistics tell the story. Black life expectancy is six years shorter than that of whites. Black unemployment is twice as high. Blacks are twice as likely as whites to die from disease, accident or murder at every stage of their lives. About 24 per cent of black families live below the poverty line, compared with 8 per cent of the white population."

Following the Katrina hurricane, when the truth could not be hidden, US corporate news networks soon started a cover up, with boring repeat visits of the President and statements. However, it has fooled no one except the usual suspects, info-challenged US population.

Below  is an article on abuse by US troops and interrogators in report by US Gen Antonio Taguba

The author had met with and heard the testimony of the victims of Abu Gharaib and Guantmano at the hearings of the Kuala Lumpur Tribunal on War Trials in October , 2009 .


Gajendra Singh 26 Octobeer, 2010,Delhi
Gen Taguba Unveils Abu Ghraib, US Gulag

27 June, 2007

 "The abused are only Iraqis," a US Gen to Gen Taguba by K Gajendra Singh    
"From the moment a soldier enlists, we inculcate loyalty, duty, honor, integrity, and selfless service. And yet when we get to the senior-officer level we forget those values."US Gen Antonio Taguba.

A senior US General in Iraq to Gen Taguba --" the abused detainees were 'only Iraqis.'"

"US Soldier Sodomised Female Iraqi Detainee". Former British Ambassador Craig Murray's blog headline.

"--we violated the laws of land warfare in Abu Ghraib. We violated the tenets of the Geneva Convention. We violated our own principles and we violated the core of our military values. I believe, even today, that those civilian and military leaders responsible should be held accountable." Gen Taguba.

"It must always be remembered that whatever is happening in Iraq is the responsibility of US which led the illegal invasion of Iraq and continues forced occupation against the will of its people, acquiesced in by an impotent and dying United Nations under Sec Gen –What is his name !"-Author

Seymour Hersh , the well known US investigative journalist has done it again –methodically chipping away at United State administration's blatant lies and spins to further unveil the torture and abuse of Iraqis at US created 'Gulag' at Abu Ghraib and US Administrations effort to muzzle an honest US voice .

In an interview with Hersh in New Yorker , Major General Antonio Taguba who led the first military investigation in 2004 into human rights abuses at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq has bluntly questioned the integrity of former US Secretary of Defence, Donald Rumsfeld, suggesting he misled the US Congress by downplaying his own prior knowledge of what had happened. Gen Taguba also claimed in the interview that President George Bush also "had to be aware" of the atrocities despite saying at the time of the scandal that he had been out of the loop until he saw images in the US media.

As usual the White House denied it and –"the President said over three years ago that he first saw the pictures of the abuse on the television," added Scott Stanzel, a spokesman.

There has been little reaction in US main line media ie corporate controlled ' be the first ' purveyors of spins and lies. Or among honourable members of the US Congress who had sanctioned the illegal invasion of Iraq opening up the gates of hell on hapless Iraqis. As if the well documented US ugliness belongs to some one else . Even the US electorate's demand last November to bring back US troops home from Iraq has been totally ignored. Some government of the people this!

Such things were to be expected after an invasion launched to grab Iraqi oil . The men should be impeached and tried for misleading the world and the American people .The naked ugly truth is being slowly but relentlessly being exposed .Libby's conviction , illegal doings of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. and a Vice President who even claims immunity from the law of the land . Verily USA has created a lawless jungle abroad and at home too.

The New Yorker interview has only amplified what was partially known .Gen Taguba, who investigated Abu Ghraib, confirms details of the abuse not previously known thus publicly giving them official authority . It also confirms that the torture was sanctioned from the top.

Not part of the interview , but General Janis Karpinski has testified that she saw a memorandum on "Interrogation techniques" pinned to the wall by military intelligence at Abu Ghraib, signed by Defence Secretary Rumsfeld himself. Karpinski was at the top of the line of command of the guards - the military police - but not the interrogators. Doubtless more of the details of the war crimes at Abu Ghraib, and of extraordinary rendition and Guantanamo, will continue to emerge in the next few months as the war party in Washington becomes totally discredited.

Sexual aggression is not really about sex or gender, but about power: the powerful humiliating the powerless.

The General's 53-page report, first written in February 2004 , had found Iraqi detainees in a cellblock of the notorious Abu Ghraib prison outside Baghdad subjected to "sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses" at the hands of their U.S. jailers. The abuses included sodomizing of prisoners, pouring cold water and chemicals on naked bodies, threatening detainees with rape and dog attacks, hitting them with chairs and broomsticks and locking them in isolation without food, water or a toilet for three days. The report also found a virtual collapse of the command structure in Abu Ghraib with Army reservists being urged by military intelligence and CIA employees to "set physical and mental conditions for favorable interrogation of witnesses."

Chairman of the Joint Cheifs of Staff Gen Richard Myers had then denied the contents to the media but gave conflicting answers . And when pressed, he acknowledged that he had not even read the report.

Gen Taguba noted that Rumsfeld not only denied advance knowledge, but even denied afterwards having seen Taguba's report or knowing what had happened. Rumsfeld testified before Congress that he had no idea of the extent of the abuse.

"He's trying to acquit himself and a lot of people who are lying to protect themselves," the magazine quoted Taguba as saying, referring to Rumsfeld's May 7, 2004 testimony in the Congress.

Taguba affirmed , "There was no doubt in my mind that this stuff"—the explicit images—"was gravitating upward. It was standard operating procedure to assume that this had to go higher. The President had to be aware of this." He said that Rumsfeld, his senior aides, and the high-ranking generals and admirals who stood with him as he misrepresented in the Congress what he( Rumsfeld) knew about Abu Ghraib had failed the nation.

The photographs that became public at the time of enquiry and created worldwide reprehension, revulsion and condemnation - showed US jailers humiliating inmates who were naked, hooded, on leashes or piled into a human pyramid.

Gen Taguba said that other material not yet public or mentioned in trials included a video showing "a male American soldier in uniform sodomising a female detainee". The first wave of images also included images of sexual humiliation between a father and his son.

Gen Taguba also added he was ordered to limit his inquiry into the conduct of military police at the jail even as he became convinced they had a green light from higher up. "Somebody was giving them guidance but I was legally prevented from further investigation into higher authority. I was limited to a box." He declares ,"Even today ... those civilian and military leaders responsible should be held accountable."

Gen Taguba was victimized for doing his duty as he was subsequently forced to retire early. His conclusion was that he was being punished for honest investigation. "They always shoot the messenger," Gen Taguba told Seymour Hersh. "To be accused of being overzealous and disloyal - that cuts deep into me. I was being ostracised for doing what I was asked to do." And he did that as an honest and upright officer and as a decent human being .

The politicians in the Congress could not care less. A Quinnipiac University poll this month found Congress with an approval rating of just 23 percent. "People voted for change. But they don't think they got it," said Peter Brown, an assistant director of the poll. A Gallup poll last month had put Congress's approval rating at 29 percent. The number had fallen to 21 percent last December, just when Republicans were sent packing by the electorate.

Some extracts from the New Yorker interview ;
"Here . . . comes . . . that famous General Taguba—of the Taguba report!" Rumsfeld declared, in a mocking voice. The meeting was attended by Paul Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld's deputy; Stephen Cambone, the Under-Secretary of Defense for Intelligence; General Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff ( J.C.S.); and General Peter Schoomaker, the Army chief of staff, along with Craddock and other officials. Taguba, describing the moment nearly three years later, said, sadly, "I thought they wanted to know. I assumed they wanted to know. I was ignorant of the setting."

In the meeting, the officials professed ignorance about Abu Ghraib. "Could you tell us what happened?" Wolfowitz asked. Someone else asked, "Is it abuse or torture?" At that point, Taguba recalled, "I described a naked detainee lying on the wet floor, handcuffed, with an interrogator shoving things up his rectum, and said, 'That's not abuse. That's torture.' There was quiet." Rumsfeld was particularly concerned about how the classified report had become public. "General," he asked, "who do you think leaked the report?" Taguba responded that perhaps a senior military leader who knew about the investigation had done so. "It was just my speculation," he recalled. "Rumsfeld didn't say anything."

Rumsfeld also complained about not being given the information he needed. "Here I am," Taguba recalled Rumsfeld saying, "just a Secretary of Defense, and we have not seen a copy of your report. I have not seen the photographs, and I have to testify to Congress tomorrow and talk about this." As Rumsfeld spoke, Taguba said, "He's looking at me. It was a statement."

At best, Taguba said, "Rumsfeld was in denial." Taguba had submitted more than a dozen copies of his report through several channels at the Pentagon and to the Central Command headquarters, in Tampa, Florida, which ran the war in Iraq. By the time he walked into Rumsfeld's conference room, he had spent weeks briefing senior military leaders on the report, but he received no indication that any of them, with the exception of General Schoomaker, had actually read it. (Schoomaker later sent Taguba a note praising his honesty and leadership.) When Taguba urged one lieutenant general to look at the photographs, he rebuffed him, saying, "I don't want to get involved by looking, because what do you do with that information, once you know what they show?"--

On January 20th, the chief of staff at Central Command sent another e-mail to Admiral Keating, copied to General Craddock and Lieutenant General Ricardo Sanchez, the Army commander in Iraq. The chief of staff wrote, "Sir: update on alleged detainee abuse per our discussion. DID IT REALLY HAPPEN? Yes, currently have 4 confessions implicating perhaps 10 soldiers. DO PHOTOS EXIST? Yes. A CD with approx 100 photos and a video—CID has these in their possession."

In subsequent testimony, General Myers, the J.C.S. chairman, acknowledged, without mentioning the e-mails, that in January information about the photographs had been given "to me and the Secretary up through the chain of command. . . . And the general nature of the photos, about nudity, some mock sexual acts and other abuse, was described."

Nevertheless, Rumsfeld, in his appearances before the Senate and the House Armed Services Committees on May 7th, claimed to have had no idea of the extensive abuse. "It breaks our hearts that in fact someone didn't say, 'Wait, look, this is terrible. We need to do something,' " Rumsfeld told the congressmen. "I wish we had known more, sooner, and been able to tell you more sooner, but we didn't."

Rumsfeld told the legislators that, when stories about the Taguba report appeared, "it was not yet in the Pentagon, to my knowledge." As for the photographs, Rumsfeld told the senators, "I say no one in the Pentagon had seen them"; at the House hearing, he said, "I didn't see them until last night at 7:30,"wen asked specifically when he had been made aware of the photographs.

US Army – A veritable Mafia

Taguba got a different message, however, from other officers, among them General John Abizaid, then the head of Central Command. A few weeks after his report became public, Taguba, who was still in Kuwait, was in the back seat of a Mercedes sedan with Abizaid. Abizaid's driver and his interpreter, who also served as a bodyguard, were in front. Abizaid turned to Taguba and issued a quiet warning: "You and your report will be investigated."

"I wasn't angry about what he said but disappointed that he would say that to me," Taguba said. "I'd been in the Army thirty-two years by then, and it was the first time that I thought I was in the Mafia."

A former high-level Defense Department official said that, when the Abu Ghraib scandal broke, Senator John Warner, then the chairman of the Armed Services Committee, was warned "to back off" on the investigation, because "it would spill over to more important things." A spokesman for Warner acknowledged that there had been pressure on the Senator, but said that Warner had stood up to it—insisting on putting Rumsfeld under oath for his May 7th testimony, for example, to the Secretary's great displeasure.---

In January of 2006, Taguba received a telephone call from General Richard Cody, the Army's Vice-Chief of Staff. "This is your Vice," he told Taguba. "I need you to retire by January of 2007." No pleasantries were exchanged, although the two generals had known each other for years, and, Taguba said, "He offered no reason." (A spokesperson for Cody said, "Conversations regarding general officer management are considered private personnel discussions. General Cody has great respect for Major General Taguba as an officer, leader, and American patriot.")

Richard Armitage, a former Navy counter-insurgency officer who served as Deputy Secretary of State in the first Bush term, recalled meeting Taguba, then a lieutenant colonel, in South Korea in the early nineteen-nineties. "I was told to keep an eye on this young guy—'He's going to be a general,' " Armitage said. "Taguba was discreet and low key—not a sprinter but a marathoner."

General Taguba is a slight man with a friendly demeanor and an unfailingly polite correctness. "I came from a poor family and had to work hard," he said. "It was always shine the shoes on Saturday morning for church, and wash the car on Saturday for church. And Saturday also for mowing the lawn and doing yard jobs for church."

The Perfidious Brits are equally guilty in Iraq ;

The Brits too are very much in the business of torture ..The reserve stiff upper lip keeps the ugliness under covers but too much has happened and the world has seen enough .

Robert Fisk of 'The Independent who "had seen British military brutality in Northern Ireland had hopes that things might have improved but the heart wrenching case of Baha Mousa , who died of abuse and torture , proved that the dark, sinister ways employed by the British in the Irish conflict have continued . He concluded that something had gone terribly wrong in the British Army in southern Iraq.

British Playing football with human beings

Fisk went to see Kifah Taha, who was beaten so badly by British troops in the presence of Baha Mousa with terrible wounds in the groin. Baha Mousa, son of a policeman Daoud Mousa in Basra , British area of occupation died from the brutal injuries he received in British custody, was a young, decent man who worked as a receptionist in a Basra hotel. Daoud Mousa and others will carry the grief of their son's killings or rapes of their daughters with them for ever.

Fisk was told how "the soldiers would call their Iraqi prisoners by the names of football stars - Beckham was one name they used - before kicking them around the detention headquarters in Basra. There were stories of Iraqi prisoners being forced to kneel on sharp stones, of being kicked and punched in the groin, the kidneys, the back, shoulders, forced to sit with their heads down lavatory holes."

There's an old rule of thumb applied to armies in the field said Fisk. "If you find out about one abuse, you can bet there were a hundred others that will never be revealed. New stories of "forced disappearances", hostage-taking and torture in British custody are emerging from Basra. US troops are still being questioned about unlawful killings and torture in Iraq. If one girl is raped and murdered and her family slaughtered by a US unit south of Baghdad - all of which is true - how many others have died in circumstances we shall never discover?", added Fisk.

But there would be blow back too. Accounts would be settled.

American detainees in Iran

For Americans, it would be a surprise to see the word "detainee" suddenly appear in a different country, in a different context , this time to a group of Americans. After all, "detainee" is the word the Bush administration coined to deal with suspected terrorist captives who, they argued, should be subjected to extra-legal treatment as part of the Global War on Terrorism. As feared the terminology is, being turned against American citizens under detention in Iran now.

The Iranian government currently holds in custody Haleh Esfandiari, Kian Tajbakhsh, Parnaz Azima, and Ali Shakeri, Iranian-American scholars and activists accused of being spies and/or employees of the U.S. government intent on fomenting dissent and disruption within Iran. (A fifth American, Robert Levinson, a former FBI agent engaged in business of an unknown nature in Iran, disappeared on March 8th.) The four are reportedly behind bars at Tehran's notorious Evin prison, meant for political prisoners including human rights activists. The Americans had abducted 6 Iranian diplomats in Kurdistan from the Irbil Consulate arousing much anger and dismay in the Kurdish regional government.

Any way who carries out US overt and covert policies of regime change inside Iran , for which the Congress regularly apportions many tens of millions of US dollars .

Sexual sadism of Western culture –In peace and war
At the time of hearings in May 2004 ,Katharine Viner wrote in 'The Guardian' about 'The sexual sadism of our culture, in peace and in war" She had received some horrific photographs from Iraq, depicting " the sexual abuse of women by US servicemen. On some, chadors were hitched up over the women's heads. On others, the women were naked while they were raped by groups of men. ----- They make you sick to your stomach. And they look strangely familiar - like the XXX films in hotel rooms, like those "live rape!" emails sent to internet users, like porn.

"--We know that such images exist, because a US government report confirmed it. And we know that Iraqi women are being raped throughout the country, because both Amal Kadham Swadi, the Iraqi lawyer, and the US's own internal inquiry say that abuse is systemic and widespread. We also know this because all wars feature the abuse of women as a byproduct, or as a weapon. The ancient Greeks considered rape socially acceptable; the Crusaders raped their way to Constantinople; the English invaders raped Scottish women on Culloden Moor. The first world war, the second world war, Bosnia, Bangladesh, Vietnam - where the gang rape and murder of a peasant woman by US soldiers was photographed in stages by one if its participants.

"The poses, the large numbers of men to one woman, the violence - they have all the hallmarks of contemporary porn. Indeed, there is suspicion that the photos are part of a gruesome new trend There's a difference, of course, between the making of pornography for money and the photographing of pornographic poses as war trophies: the consent of the woman involved? But to the consumer of these images, there's no way of knowing if there's been consent or not. They look the same."

In February,2004 US soldiers were accused of raping more than 112 colleagues in Iraq and Afghanistan --- seem to have to prove that they are one of the guys by sexually humiliating the only people less important than they are: Iraqi prisoners, of whatever sex. It's a chilling lesson, that women can be sexual sadists just as well as men. Just give them the right conditions - and someone weaker to kick. It's proof that sexual aggression is not really about sex or gender, but about power: the powerful humiliating the powerless.?

==appear on pornographic websites. They will be used for sexual gratification.-- Of course we are horrified by these images. But we should be horrified too by their familiarity, and how much they tell us about our own societies."

Pornography is worth tens of billions dollars business in USA .Is this the civilization the rest of the world in envious of as US leaders constantly proclaim ie superiority of their civilization .

Conclusions ;

Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche , 19th cent German philosopher , inspired by Plato's Utopia aka Republic , in turn inspired the evil genius and 20th  Century  political philosopher Leo Strauss , at whose feet sat the still influential Neo-Cons and Zeo-cons , had stated that Christian love and piety was an outcome of fear. The fear of the strongly built neighbour or the fear of a criminal from a police man .

Nietzsche believed that it was not possible that a man could genuinely feel universal love, perhaps because of his self-created halo of a 'noble' man . That was perhaps meant for two combatants or knights matching their valour on level ground, not like F-16 bombers against kids armed with slingshots or rudimentary guns .

Many in the West are not even ashamed describing the US "victory" over Iraq in 2003 an example of military valour when US defence expenditure was S$ 450 billion vs Iraq's 2.5 billion after US-UK implemented sanctions had decayed Iraqi defences .The sanctions also killed half a million children of malnutrition according to UN reports. .

Kemal Ataturk , the great strategician ,would have laughed his head off at this spurious claim. Even Montgomery who believed that 4 to one superiority was enough when attacking .Only ignoble deeds by ignoble men shine in the US led West .The so called western 'noble' is now likely to be a poor American from rural areas, a high tech brute ensconced in his armour afraid to come out of his humvee against motivated bombers with just their body to sacrifice against all odds . Would Nietzsche have called the bombers 'noble'!

The noble martial combat was over after the second siege of Vienna in late 16th century , when high tech killing started taking over from Janissaries valour. The final result now is the complete take over of the US by consumerist Military Industry complex , which gobbles up as much in 'defence ' expenditure as the rest of the world put together ,of which the generals and soldiers are consumers paid for by the people of America and now of the world with an iniquitous economic order where in US just prints greenbacks . US power has morphed into world financed-techno-barbarian brute.

In his book on what Bertrand Russell calls history of Western Philosophy ( West has generally produced linear thought , its real philosophers are ridiculed ) he quotes from Shakespeare's King Lear , on the verge of madness
"I will do such things –
What they are yet I know not – but they shall be
The terror of the earth.

( Exactly what the top US leadership has achieved in Iraq and threatens doing more of the same. )

This is Nietzsche's philosophy in nutshell. Donald Rumsfeld's unknown unknowns or Bush's all options including tactical weapons when there is no danger of an Iranian nuke in near future .No wonder a worried and wizened El Bardai in Vienna called for a control on 'crazies 'in USA.

Russell says there are two sorts of saints, saints by nature and saints by fear. The first have spontaneous love of mankind. Because to do so gives him happiness and the second , a frightened man afraid of fear. ( Western leaders like Henry Kissinger , Dick Cheney ,Tony Blair would fit the bill )

It is existential fear of Jesus Christ's saying turned devilshly on its head .Do not do unto others what you would not like done unto you . The fear what Iran would do after 5 years or ten years .What Iraqis would do . Would Assassins emerge from the Middle East and Asia or Muslim citizens in Europe and Black Muslims in USA . What north Korea with nukes and missiles threatened to do to stop a menacing US. Humans and the world has now been reduced by USA to lawless jungle.

Leo Strauss was an admirer of the British Empire and Winston Churchill as an example of the will-driven statesman. Recent Churchill admirers are ; the extinguished poodle Tony Blair and lame duck George Bush . After being part of killing of over 666,000 Iraqis Blair said history will judge him. He has been judged and the Brits would pay the price .If the Brits could not remove Blair early enough ,then why blame poor Iraqis for not removing late President Saddam Hussein of Iraq , and why .Whom , now faced with acute security deficit and instability Iraqis miss , even Shias. And perhaps in their hearts the Americans too. Certainly before March 2003 USA was a hyper power , a phrase rarely used now for a degenerated ogre .

The use of deception and manipulation in current US policies flow directly from the doctrines of the Leo Strauss (1899-1973). His disciples including Paul Wolfowitz and other Neo-conservatives who have driven much of the political agenda of the Bush administration. Wolfowitz, acknowledged that the evidence used to justify the war was "murky" and added that weapons of mass destruction weren't the crucial issue anyway. Grabbing Iraqi oil for nothing was !He had told US Congress that Iraq's development would be financed by Iraq oil revenues ( which US is trying to gift to US multinationals ). Paul also tried to finance his love nest from the World Bank funds and refused to resign when caught with his hand in the till or where ever it should not have been.

Another Neo-Con Douglas Feith recently told one Wolf Blitzer last year if he had no car accident did not mean that he should not take out car insurance this year .So "operation Iraqi freedom" was an insurance policy ! Some Straussian reasoning . On mere suspicions one could attack another country .Suppose some one is reading a book on fundamentals of nuclear Physics. Attack his country according to Straussian or Feith logic . Even Taimur lung , in those lawless days ,attacked only if sure of a threat building up, not on suspicions alone .Wolf the Blitzer was so easily convinced . These are West's top journalists!

Did the US system reach its zenith of power and now lie exposed an abyss of cheating, chicanery , corruption ,hypocrisy and total lawlessness .

The current direction of US led Western civilization , if you can call it so, is hurtling along retrograde evolution of human animal ; away from the divine and spiritual moorings and identity as all religions discovered intuitively over millennia to a world of heedless and headless consumerism like an unerring laser to wards self destruction, Nuclear bombs and cold nights or climate atastrophes and apocalypse.      Bucharest (Romania) 28 June, 2007.

To Hell With Rothschild Usury
Huey Long, The Populist
The Greater Pledge (Pat Tilman)

.The Present Situation Made Simple
Why the Zionists Killed George S Patton
The Myth of German Culpability
Goebbles and Hydreich
Hitler Army Diversity

Palash Biswas
Pl Read:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...


Website counter


Blog Archive